Soft Arts

A lot of spammers try to get around spam filters by using unusual spellings of terms that humans will recognize but black lists won’t (i.e., “pr0n”).

Perhaps spam filters could capitalize on this and run incoming email through a dictionary. Anything with more than 3 or 4 unrecognizable words gets flagged. Unrecognized terms can be added to the dictionary to help the system develop a more sophisticated vocabulary.

Obviously some innocent people are going to send messages that will be flagged as possible spam, but paying attention to your spell checker before sending out email will help considerable. Technical emails would like prove more of a problem as most dictionaries don’t include a particularly wide range of technical terms in them.

Spammers have recently started sending out fake invoices from iTunes, and it got me thinking: wouldn’t it be great if Apple included a secret word in their email notifications that I would immediately recognize? Once I thought about it a little more, I realized that the idea could easily extend to just about any service, and could also be used to eliminate false positives in spam filters.

This would be an effective anti-phishing technique. Let’s say your bank asks you to pick a safe word to be associated with your account. Once that’s selected, any email that they send to you will include that safeword in the email’s subject line as an easily identifiable sign of authenticity.

If you picked “Incontinent Panda” as your safe word, instead of
Subject: Bank of America: Important Notice On Your Account Information (Re-Confirm)

you would see

Subject: [Incontinent Panda] Bank of America: Important Notice On Your Account Information (Re-Confirm)

Since the odds of a phisher guessing this pass phrase is pretty low, you can tell at a glance that this is most likely the real deal. Since these emails go out to you, and you only, the odds of the safe word getting compromised is fairly low.

Dieter Rams - the 10 Commandments of Good Design.

Rams was an industrial designer for Braun, had a profound influence on Jonathan Ive, and by extension, Apple. This is moving and insightful stuff.

Via Kyle Kinkade

This article, “Why sustainable power is unsustainable”, from the New Scientist gives examples of exactly the kinds of issues I’d been thinking of when I came up with Pasco’s Law.

Specifically, each of the ideas presented starts to present serious problems once they are adopted on major scale.

Good article.

Soft Arts as seen by Wordle